Godrej Consumer Products Limited (GCPL) consistently reports its financial and non-financial performance in accordance with regulatory requirements such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015; the Companies Act, 2013; and Secretarial Standards. This marks our sixth Annual and Integrated Report, structured to comply with the International Integrated Reporting Framework (the
Our R&D teams lead new product development
across the geographies we operate in
Content of the report
We aim to provide an overview of our financial and non-financial performance through Integrated Reporting, demonstrating the creation of short and long-term value for our stakeholders.
This report offers insights into:
- Material issues and our operational context
- Governance framework
- Key strategies
- Value creation approach across capitals
- Performance identified against Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- Interrelation among material issues, strategies, performance, and value creation
- Financial and statutory reporting
Scope and boundary
This report covers GCPL, including its manufacturing facilities across India, Africa, Indonesia, Latin America, and the USA. Unless specified otherwise, all data and content herein are consolidated for our entire business operations.
Aligned with our commitment to transparent reporting and sustainable business operations, we have followed the taxonomy set by the Securities and Exchange Board of India's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) and the Task Force on Climate- Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework. Our adherence to these rigorous frameworks offers a thorough insight into our sustainability goals and the efficacy of our initiatives for our stakeholders.
Reporting period
All data, both financial and nonfinancial, covers the period spanning April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. To offer a thorough assessment of our sustainability performance, we have included comparative figures from the previous fiscal year (2022-23) as well as from the baseline year (2011-12, excluding statutory financials). This approach allows for a holistic evaluation of our progress over time. By examining our activities implemented between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024, alongside historical data from preceding years, we aim to highlight ongoing trends and provide a basis for comparative analysis, facilitating an assessment of our overall advancement. 5
Forward Looking Statements
The Integrated Annual Report includes forward-looking statements in the Management Discussion and Analysis, indicating the Company's objectives using terms such as 'may'. 'believe', 'outlook', 'plan', 'anticipate', 'continue', 'estimate', and 'expect'. These statements are grounded in reasonable assumptions but may be influenced by risks, uncertainties, and external factors, potentially resulting in deviations from expressed or implied outcomes.The forward-looking statements in this report are applicable only as of the statement date. GCPL is not obligated to publicly release revisions or updates to these statements after this report's date, except as required by law or regulatory authorities. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
Double Materiality assessment
At GCPL, we put people and planet alongside profits. Our materiality approach is aligned with our strategic vision and value creation. We identified material issues by extensively engaging with our stakeholders and monitoring industry trends.
In the fiscal year 2023-24, we embraced a double materiality approach to align with our sustainability vision. We explored and evaluated Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues relevant to our business operations and our stakeholders. We also examined how material issues, business risks, objectives, and value creation are interconnected. The aim of this double materiality assessment is to prioritise the ESG topics most relevant to our operations and stakeholders, while considering the impact between our organisation and the broader sustainability landscape.
We integrated our materiality considerations into our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process where relevant, particularly focusing on areas such as Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), governance, and sustainable packaging that are overseen at a Board level. Our procedure involves identifying significant risks and opportunities with substantial financial implications and integrating them into the ERM framework.
Recently, we completed a new double materiality assessment in reference to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) guidance for materiality assessment released in February 2024, and the draft European Sustainability Reporting Standard (ESRS), ESRS 1 general requirement standard, released in November 2022, our Double Materiality Assessment is conducted in alignment with Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Disclosure (CSRD) guidelines. We have used the Double Materiality framework to assess a sustainability topic from both impact perspective and/or financial standpoint. We are now in the process of including additional topics like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in our ERM approach.
This continuous initiative ensures that pertinent material issues are efficiently handled and monitored within our risk management structure.
Process flow of double materiality
Stakeholder engagement
Stakeholder engagement is crucial to our materiality assessment to ensure a diverse representation of interests across the regions where GCPL operates. As a leading FMCG company, we understand that our responsibilities extend beyond consumer products. The success of GCPL heavily relies on effectively managing sustainability factors to drive business value and make a positive impact on communities and the environment. Through the double materiality assessment, we aim to identify and prioritise the most
significant sustainability factors affecting GCPL, while recognizing areas where GCPL can influence outcomes. To achieve this, we initiated interactions with key stakeholder groups to identify a comprehensive list of material issues. Key stakeholders were identified based on their influence, interest, and impact on the business. These included Leadership, Employees, Suppliers, Customers, Investors, NGO Partners, and Industry Associations. We tailored our questionnaire to stakeholders to gauge their perspectives and priorities.
We assessed each material issue for its relative importance across different stakeholder groups, and these insights were aggregated through stakeholder analysis.
Stakeholder prioritisation
We assessed the importance of stakeholders based on two critical parameters – their ability to influence GCPL’s performance and operations, and the extent of their influence due to GCPL’s performance and operations. We
then assigned relative weightages based on these parameters. This helped us to accurately prioritise materiality topics based on stakeholder conversation and inputs and reflect the significance of each stakeholder in our business context.
Stakeholder |
Stakeholder group |
Ability of a stakeholder to strongly influence GCPL’s performance and operations |
Extent of influence on a stakeholder due to GCPL’s performance and operations |
---|---|---|---|
Internal Stakeholders | Leadership Team (L4) | High | High |
Employees (L3-L1) | Medium | High | |
External Stakeholders | Suppliers | Medium | Medium |
Customers | Medium | Medium | |
Investors | Medium | High | |
NGO Partners | Low | Medium | |
Industry Associations | Low | Medium |
Methodology & findings
For fiscal year 2023-24 double materiality assessment, we considered both GCPL’s domestic and international operations spanning India, Sri-Lanka, Bangladesh, Argentina, Chile, Africa, Indonesia, and the USA.
To kick off, we updated GCPL’s previous materiality assessment from 2020
and conducted secondary research on global frameworks and the FMCG sector landscape to draw out relevant sustainability topics. We identified a universe of 40 material topics to be considered for the assessment. Below is the preliminary list of sustainability topics:
Preliminary universe of 40 identified material topics
-
SrEnvironment
-
1Climate Change
-
2Biodiversity & Land use
-
3Forestation
-
4Ecological Impacts
-
5Energy Management
-
6Emissions
-
7Toxic Emissions
-
8Product Carbon Footprint
-
9Water Management
-
10Waste Management
-
11Environmental Policy & Management Systems
-
12Community Relations
-
13Product Safety & Quality
-
14Labor Practice Indicators
-
SrSocial
-
15Privacy & Data Security
-
16Supply Chain Management
-
17Chemical Safety
-
18Health & safety
-
19Human Capital Development
-
20Materials Sourcing & Efficiency
-
21Customer Relationship Management
-
22Selling Practices & Product Labelling
-
23Product Design & Lifecycle Management
-
24Customer Privacy
-
25Access & Affordability
-
26Talent Attraction & Retention
-
27Sustainable Agricultural Practices
-
SrGovernance
-
28Innovation Management
-
29Business Ethics
-
30Tax Transparency
-
31Ownership & Control
-
32Corporate Governance
-
33Accounting
-
34Competitive Behaviour
-
35Management of the Legal & Regulatory Environment
-
36Critical Incident Risk Management
-
37Systemic Risk Management
-
38Policy Influence
-
39Transparency & Reporting
-
40Macro Economy & Geopolitical Risk
We selected these 40 topics for our stakeholder engagement, involving interactions with employees, suppliers, investors, consumers, industry partners, and NGO partners. We organised 47 one-on-one interviews – online and in-person – across geographies. The discussion enabled us to identify sustainability areas important to our stakeholders. Based on this, our
preliminary list of 40 material topics was refined to a consolidated list of 20 material topics.
We then conducted an online survey and asked our stakeholders to rank the significance of each topic. This helped us
to gather stakeholder perspectives on current and potential sustainability risks and opportunities. We collected 184 responses across all our stakeholder groups. Based on these inputs and the weightage assigned to each stakeholder group, we computed and prioritised the top 20 topics based on stakeholder preferences.
Material issues
Top material issues |
Link to our |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GCPL Materiality Matrix
The following figure maps out the entire universe of material issues and stakeholder input and its significance in our business.
GCPL Materiality Matrix
A note on COVID-19
We engage with all our stakeholders on a regular basis to foster and nurture strong relationships, which in turn help us improve our strategy
and decision-making and grow our business. In a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic, our partnerships with our stakeholders became even more important.
The table below provides an overview of our stakeholder engagement process and the steps we take to understand the needs and priorities of each stakeholder group.